Part 2 Nephilim ( Their and our origins)

Posted by: Thomas in Untagged  on Print PDF

Thomas

Continuing on from part 1 ( you will probably want to read part 1 first ), we can discuss the origins of these Nephilim and Rephraim breeds. However, for this you will need to completely open your mind. From part 1, what we can gather is that the Nephilim of old were larger than us and less moral overall than we are now. They liked war, sex, eating, and most importantly the perversions of these things.

The Rephraim ( used generically to encompass all the giant breeds)  were the post flood offspring of mainly Ham who tended to have the same perversions as the original Nephilim. Nimrod/Amraphel, the King of Shinar/Babylon was the first of the mighty men of old- the giants. Remember that Nimrods mother is Ishtar/Ashtar/Easter whom the religion of Christianity still enrolls in. I am still trying to figure out how Ham was different than Shem and Japeth. It states that Shem is the oldest and tells us that Ha Shem is his God, suggesting that after concecrating his first born to Father, his other 2 sons were given to other Elohim. As the Law requires Father to be given only the 1stborn, not every child. But where did they all come from? And where did we come from? Same place- Our Creator.

In Genesis, when our  Creator made the heavens, He created what we perceive as celestrial objects as His fellow beings with their own features. When Father (Elah)  said "Let us make man in our image" He was talking to the Elohim ( beings of God )that He had made in the heavens. So in their and Father's combined images were we made.

Let us first take a look in the Garden with Adam and Eve. Everyone knows this story, but do we really. Adam and Eve ate an apple, were cursed, got kicked out of Eden and had children. -At least that is what the traddition is. But Father repeatedly calls on us to come to Him for our learning, not religions.

There are a couple of logical possibilities to the story, making it essential that we stay in the parameters of the information we are given by our Father for the outcome to hold fruit. I add nothing to the information, only sort it out:

1. Adam was surrounded by animals in the garden but none were found suitable, so Eve was made for him. Gen 2.18-20

2. Adam and his wife were naked. Gen 3. and then the evil one approached Eve. God then kicks them out of the garden for the apple right? Hold on!  "His wife" means that Adam already "knew" Eve!

3. Cain is born (bare with me until i explain).

4. After bearing Cain, Eve then gets duped (at least once)  by the serpent as does Adam, leaving Eve with Abel and Adam literally and physically sore. God gives Adam and Eve "skins" and then kicks them out.

Crazy you say? My response is that in Genesis 4 "Adam knew his wife and she conceived and bore Cain". , Genesis 4.2,"She then bore his brother Abel." But it doesnt say what "Abel" means. It is the same letters as "eat" in the Hebrew translation. To connect the reaction of Abel back to the action of eating the forbidden tree, the evil one.

Now that i have you thinking, there are only 2 viable paths before us concerning "Cain knew his wife"Gen 4.17,  according to the information given. Either:

a. Cain knew Eve,  Or; b. there was a twin gene from Adam and Eve, giving Cain a twin sister whom Cain could have then known. i am currently working on this theory.

After this, Adam and Eve (steve was doing a promo in london at the time) had Seth. Adam tells us that after receiving the new skins, Seth at least looks like him, and that after Seth, Adam had many sons and daughters (relief to Eve). Gen. 5. The book of Jasher says that when Cain was killed, he was perceived to be an animal. Moving on, it should be noted that even though Abel can be concluded to be from the evil one, God was still upset that Abel was killed, and also that God originally wasnt too thrilled over the toil of our hands and the soil, He was more interested in Abel reproducing and maintaining life.

 There is so much previously unforseen information reguarding sexual habits in the Tanakh, that i will have to cut this short and put it in parts. So shall we skip to Abraham. Keep in mind that God's Law's were few back then in Abram's time.

Abram lived in Ur for 75 years when he set out for Caanan. He took with him Sarai and Hagor. Gen. 16 tells us that Sarai couldnt conceive, so after 10 years, Sarai gave Hagor to Abraham as concubine. Abram knew Hagor and was born Ishmael ("like wild ass") to Abraham at 86, 11 years after leaving Canaan. 13-14 years later according to Genesis, Sarah bears Isaac to Abraham. But what have we missed in this story?

This is where it gets weired! Let us go back to Gen. 15, where Abraham complains to God about not having children. God says to bring a 3 year old heifer, a 3 year old she-goat, a 3 year old ram, a turtle dove and a bird. Abram cuts the carcasses but doesnt kill the bird. An odd feeling falls upon Abram in the night.

So which carcasses was it that Abram cut in half? Not the bird. We know from the Tanakh that most sacrifices are tokened with a ram (male). It does mention carcasses so we can assume this is more than one carcass probably including the turtledove for other offering. Then Abraham left Ur.

It would be conclusive to the information that we have been given, that Hagor is the 3 year old heifer(donkey) that Abram didn't cut up. Why else would it be that when Sarah had Isaac, Abraham put the, what was then 14 year old Ishmael on Hagor's shoulder? No wonder one of the Elahim found Hagor "wondering".

If your mind is quicker than mine, than you have already guessed that Sarah is the 3 year old she-goat Abraham didnt cut up. In Gen. 18, when 3 Elahim came to Abraham, Abraham went to fetch food for them.Abraham runs in and tells Sarah ,"quick 3 sehas of flour!" then Abram runs and has his servant boy (Ishmael) to prepare a calf.

Gen. 18.8 says Abram took curds and milk and the calf to the Elahim. The calf was prepared by the servant boy. So,who then had the curds and milk?? Sarah, Abraham's goat. Abraham being Abram being part A ram.

Sarah was not 90 when she had IsYak, but from Gen. 17.17 it would be better understood, " Could a man have a child at 100, and could Sarah have had a child 10 years ago when i tried at 90?"

Additional significance of the 3 Elahim visiting Abraham is that it appears to be at Passover/Feast of Unleavened Bread when 2 of the Elahim went to Sodom where Lot also was feasting with unleavend bread like Abraham.

As we search through Genesis and beyond, with different clashes of creatures but always the same message: Obey our Creator. We are all part animal and the Rephraim have been interwoven into us throughout our history, as even some of us today have these genes within us. For now i will leave you with the question of Judges 19... what kind of concubine did the Levite priest have?


Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy