National Health Scare, H1N1

Posted by: guardian Snow in myblog on Print PDF

guardian Snow

“I, Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including sections 201 and 301 of the National Emergencies Act … do hereby find and proclaim that, given that the rapid increase in illness across the nation may overburden health care resources and that the temporary waiver of certain standard federal requirements may be warranted in order to enable U.S. health care facilities to implement emergency operations plans, the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in the United States constitutes a national emergency.”

 

Pro 10:24 What the wrong one fears comes upon him, But the desire of the righteous is granted.

 

Do you believe there is a “national emergency”?  The declaration of President Obama says that because the Flu “may overburden health care”, he is taking “proactive” steps in creating hysteria over what WAS nothing more than a regular flu season running its course.  I say specifically “was” in that now that it has been suggested that a state of emergency is present, one will exist because of the power of suggestion.

 

While the motivations of the health scare may be to further his political agenda of pushing socialized health care, Pandora is let out of the box and those who look to Obama as an authority will believe and not be convinced otherwise that the significance of H1N1’s impact is so insignificant that the vaccine and the declaration by Obama will do more damage than the actual virus.

 

While the immediate issues of the declaration only relate to privacy and issuing government payouts, the hysteria created by a “national emergency” should be of greater concern.  To that extent, the VeriChip Corporation is working to provide a under skin implant “to aid” in the detection of different strains of viruses.

 

Personally, I have zero concern for this supposed pandemic but this is because I know and trust scriptures that read:

 

 Exo 15:26 And He said, “If you diligently obey the voice of YAHWEH your Elohim and do what is right in His eyes, and shall listen to His commands and shall guard all His laws, I shall bring on you none of the diseases I brought on the Mitsrites, for I am YAHWEH who heals you.”

 

In short, I have nothing to fear but fear itself and you should go forward in that same knowledge.  I further have to wonder about the people employed by Verichip and their eagerness to capitalize on the imagined problem and would point out that the potential health problems increase by having foreign to the body implants. 

 

The “solutions” are in fact the very elements creating more problems. President Obama has demonstrated to me that he is willfully destructive and I say this because he is creating an “emergency” because of what “may” happen.

 

The reality is that he could have implemented these relatively minor changes of law through normal congressional channels without the hype, so the objective of this declaration isn’t to change the law, it is to change perception by creating FEAR, don’t buy into it.

 

First Daughters Not Vaccinated Against H1N1

 

President Obama's school age daughters have not been vaccinated against the H1N1 flu virus.  White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs says the vaccine is not available to them based on their risk.

 

The  Centers for Disease Control recommend that children ages 6 months through 18 years of age receive a vaccination against the H1N1 flu virus. The CDC also says a regular seasonal flu shot does not protect against the virus.

 

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/10/08/first-daughters-not-vaccinated-against-h1n1/

 

-------

Now that we have a “National Emergency”, shouldn’t the first family be the first to be inoculated by the H1N1 vaccine as a show of support of his own policy?  I find this interesting considering the current Marxist climate in Congress on the issue of health care.  Is it simply a coincidence that we have a health care related “national emergency” while the congress is attempting to pass health care reform?

-------

 

When Asked Where the Constitution Authorizes Congress to Order Americans To Buy Health Insurance, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Says: 'Are You Serious?' Nadeam Elshami, then told CNSNews.com that asking the speaker of the House where the Constitution authorized Congress to mandated that individual Americans buy health insurance as not a "serious question."

 

Currently, each of the five health care overhaul proposals being considered in Congress would command every American adult to buy health insurance. Any person defying this mandate would be required to pay a penalty to the Internal Revenue Service.

 

In 1994, when the health care reform plan then being advanced by President Clinton called for mandating that all Americans buy health insurance, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office studed the issue and concluded:

 

“The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States. An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique. First, it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government.”

 

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55971

 

 

Num 6:24 “Yahweh bless you and guard you;

Num 6:25 Yahweh make His face shine upon you, and show favour to you;

Num 6:26 Yahweh lift up His face upon you, and give you peace.” ’

 

Shalom,

   *´¨)

  ¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)

(¸.•´   (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

 

“Money is regarded as the cause of theft and murder, of deception and betrayal. Money is blamed when the prostitute sells her body and when the bribed judge perverts the law. It is money against which the moralist declaims when he wishes to oppose excessive materialism.”
Ludwig von Mises

 

Monetary Economics

http://mises.org/multimedia/mp3/ss08/16_Gold08_Salin.mp3

How Abolishing the Fed Would Change Everything (for the better)

 

“The conflict view asserts that only one strain of doctrine can assume the commanding heights, and so all the progress of groups lower on the faith chain depends on unseating others from power. Secular groups can hold this view, believing that religion must be vanquished from the earth, and so too with religious groups that believe secularism must be destroyed.

 

This is why we hear about "breaking barriers" rather than encouraging opportunity, about policies rather than freedom, about power rather than entrepreneurship. For the media writing about all this, it is the only intellectual model they have in mind. The conflict view of society was taught to them in college and is reinforced daily in the press. Also, unless you have some clear filter in mind, it seems like the conflict view is supported by plenty of evidence, given that the rise of the state has actually generated social antagonism where none should exist.”

Llewellyn H. Rockwell


Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy