Has anyone been paying attention to any of the extraordinary info now available concerning 2012?

Here's one that rather exciting:

The crop circles in the So of England are now showing a serious DNA upgrade for humanity.
The double helix is now transforming into a fairly new shape. It looks like a flower blossoming.
So in short, this is what is happening in that field.
DNA in it's double strand helix is 3 dimensional, in it new form, it's 4 dimensional.

For many we have thought, that the 4th day of Genesis actually spoke of the sun the moon and the stars. However, it does not say that. It merely says 2 great lights, one to rule the day, and the lesser to rule the night. Yes I know there's more, but that's not the point I was showing.

Have you ever noticed how many times in _script_ure that man is likened unto vegetation? This speaks of the third day.
Have you noticed how many times man will be likened unto Light, i.e 'transfiguration and Dan 12 the wise shining as bright as the sun' this speaks of the fourth day.
For those able to receive it, Genesis is also about the restoration of Adam, John 1:1 should be ample enough to get you started on that.

There's a good reason to be paying attention and most of all 'seeking' for understanding of what this time represents.

The crop circles are also showing the exact planetary alignment for 12 21 2012.

Has anyone noticed that it appears our Sun has given birth to baby? Yes, that's correct. A baby sun has now appeared next to the sun. Not a small planet but a 'sun.'

There are also massive Galactic waves proceeding from out of the center of the Galaxy, due to fully hit our system in 2012.
Did you know that there appears to be a new atmosphere being created on Mars, that all the planets in the solar system are going through dramatic changes?

Comments?

Michael

We are definitely in a transition period. From 6th day (day of man) to God's 7th day?

The heavens declare the glory of God.


Here is an interesting document I came across that points out some interesting possibilities though with regard to it being 2012 exactly as per our calendar. Nothing with regard to dates is cast in stone it seems.


El Reg apologises for era error

By John Ozimek • Get more from this author

Posted in Science, 31st December 2009 13:13 GMT

El Reg would like to apologise to all its readers for the recent spate of ill-timed end of the decade articles, which it, along with the rest of the media have been tacking on to the close of 2009.

In fact, the end of the first decade of the 21st century does not take place until the year 2010. Or 2004 if a more accurate reckoning is made of the current date.

However, following an impulse toward religious schism – and mindful of the fact that those who work in IT have very little interest in a calendar that pedantically nails the seasons to the same month and day, year in year out - we are inclined to propose that the true end of this decade will actually take place on 6 April 2011. Or may already have taken place on that day in 2005.

Tying the end of the decade to 2009 is a simple enough misunderstanding, brought about by a belief in some quarters that the current western epoch, variously designated as "Anno Domini" (AD) or "Common Era" (CE) started in 0 AD. Not so.

The year 1 BC was followed immediately afterward by 1 AD: there never was a year zero – at least not in our calendar. It is therefore a matter of easy calculation to determine that the real end of the decade follows in 365 days time – and is not tonight.

Of course, that is only so if we accept two further reforms to the calendar which, in England, both took place in the 18th century. Until 1582, almost all of Western Europe (and the American Colonies) used the Julian Calendar – a system put in place by Julius Caesar in 46 BC or thereabouts.

The problem with this calendar was that it lost approximately one day with respect to the tropical year, every 128 years. By the time the 16th century rolled around, the calendar was running almost ten days "slow" – a matter of supposed serious import for an agrarian economy.

(Though some might question whether a society that lived in such close harmony with the land would attempt to match its sowing cycles to a theoretical best date set 1500 years previous – as opposed to "the same date as last year").

In February 1582, Pope Gregory XIII put forward a papal bull proposing the adoption of a new calendar:invented by Aloysius Lilius, a physician from Naples, this would forever after be known as the Gregorian Calendar. The main difference between the Gregorian and Julian calendars is that the former only allows for leap years to take place in century years that are themselves divisible by four: so 1700, 1800 and 1900 were NOT leap years; and 2000 was.

Whilst the Gregorian calendar may have had some minor positive impact on agriculture, there can be little reason to maintain such a system when the alleged effects of global warming appear to be moving the onset of winter backward and forward by several days at a time – and the majority of the population do not work on the land in any case.

We say: bring back the Julian calendar. Not only would this liberate our diaries from the dead hand of a medieval Pope: it would also make today 18 December – allowing us all to look forward to Christmas again in a week’s time!

Until 1700, the start of the year in England was, for all civil and legal purposes, the 25 March. Pressure from New Year revellers led to a shift in the agreed start date back to 1 January – thereby creating a source of confusion that has bedevilled historians ever since. Events occurring before 25 March before 1700 may be allocated to one of two different years according to whether they are recorded "New _style_" (NS) or "Old _style_"(OS).

A return to the old civil system would do away with such confusion once and for all – and put an end to argument over whether King Charles was beheaded in 1648 (OS) or 1649 (NS).

Which brings us back to the start. Using the Julian calendar and reverting to the old civil year, the next decade does not start until 7 April 2011.

QED ฎ
Bootnote:

The above only holds if we accept the calculation of 1 AD as having been accurate in the first place. Unfortunately, the year adopted as the start of our current era by scholar Dionysius Exiguus in the 6th century is almost certainly the wrong one. If we know anything about the birth date of Jesus Christ it was, according to the gospels, during the reign of King Herod – who had already been dead for four years in 1 BC.

Modern experts prefer 7BC, or thereabouts, as Jesus’ birth day – which means that today is actually 18 December 2015.

Hi Rodin:

Perhaps I didn't explain it properly.

The crop circles are showing us the alignment of the planets on 2012.

They are also showing that at that time there will be a dimensional shift from third dimensional reality to fourth dimensional reality.

What this means is simply this, Roses among other flowers have been showing us this for ever. The blossoming bud.

What is on the inside will then be on the outside.

I use the example of roses because the illustration is perfect.

A cube is 3d, 4d is what is inside the cube. It's the invisible substance if you will.

So at the shift, what is now invisible shall be made visible and what is visible shall be invisible.

So what we are within is what we shall be without.

Which is what John meant when he said, 'when we see Him we shall be like Him.

So it ought to be pretty exciting for those that have the Word of Life planted within.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEyqT2_ricA target="_blank">
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEyqT2_ricA

This is actually a pretty cool vid

Michael

Hi Michael,

Your post covered some interesting areas, which I wanted to think about before responding.

Regarding crop circles, Chuck Missler covered them in a 12-part set of YouTube videos at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCk4VMTGme4. Although _title_d "The Nephilim", he spends a lot of time on related areas including crop circles, UFOs and Project Blue Beam. The evidence points towards a higher dimension which is intersecting our own, which we see as complex geometric projections. How it all ends up remains to be seen.

As for 21 Dec 2012, I doubt that this will be the transition to the next age or coming of Messiah. For one thing, that date is nowhere near any holy days on the Biblical calendar, or even the secular Jewish one.

Second, the date coincides with Friday which is a day of work. This excludes it from consideration, because the 7th millennial 'day of rest' (i.e. 1000 years) must, by definition, commence on the regular day of rest or Sabbath.

Third, why would YHWH glorify the Islamic holy day of Friday?

Fourth, the evidence from Scrip-ture suggests that the end of this age should occur in 2017, not 2012.

Fifth, the Mayans worshiped idols, practiced human sacrifice, and used extremely cruel methods of execution. Why would YHWH honour such a people with knowledge about the end of the age, which is withheld from all other nations and especially the Jews?

I've heard of something called 'Project Enoch', which appears to be a manmade event being planned for that date. I'll leave that for you to delve into if you wish.

Finally, concerning planetary alignments, remember that "There shall not be found among you anyone who... interprets omens" (Deut 18:10).

Shalom

Hi Shaun:

Thanks for responding:

It is the dimensional shift that I thought was extremely interesting.

As to the Mayans, I think historians have done them great discredit. There was an overlap of civilizations going on at the time of their decline.
However the Mayan people still remain to this day.

Primarily it was the Aztec peoples that were into 'human sacrifice.' Which in fact so were Israel and the Judah. However, that does not negate the Torah, does it?

I saw on a website http://www.bible-codes.org/letters-2012-trueandfalse-prophecy.htm another calculation for 2012 that was done by

2012 is intersected by all biblical time _frame_s,

by "1260, 1290, 1335, and 2300 years" from the collapse of ancient civilizations frequently discussed in the bible.

No other date does this!

Surprisingly, the Mayan calendar works in concert with them!

So after checking that out, my conclusion is to give this some serious investigation.

I suppose I did make it sound like the 'second coming.'

I commend you on your caution.

But you know, the strange things happening in our own solar system signify something really big is going on. Jupiter is getting atmosphere as are several other planets. And of course massive energy waves coming from the center of the galaxy are also worthy to take note of.
You know when the sun gives birth to another sun, something heretofore unheard of is going on. And by the way this is not 'Planet X.'

But you know Shaun it's not just the Mayan calendar.
The Great Pyramid also has a time-line that is incredibly accurate. Which also shows that it's most important date is also 2012.
I think most are agreed upon the fact that the Egyptians did not build the 'Great Pyramid.' The mathematics and construction are almost 'light years' beyond human comprehension.

Now of course, I do not negate the 'feasts' never have, but there is a place where the days are cut short, this may be it.

As for omens, well I don't think paying attention to what happening in the heavens totally constitutes paying attention to omens.
There will be strange signs in the heavens.
I mean what about Rev 12.
What about the star the magi followed?

Now then it could also mean, pay attention to the upcoming passover and unleavened bread cuz it's going be a whopper.

Depending upon where we at in the world, it could be the beginning of the 'sabbath' or the end of the Islamic day.

This is also pretty cool, the crop circles have been showing up for 1200 years. They are, to the best of my knowledge, always done in 'Wheat Fields' could be a coincidence, but I don't think so.

So when I use the term 'fourth day' to liken it to a shift into the fourth dimension. For me, I look at it like this, 'Transfiguration.'

I don't know if I've said this before on the forum, but again, for me, I look at the 'Gospels, primarily Matthew and john as being far more than the 'History and Teaching of Yahshua.'
Seeing as how they are 'The Testimony of Yahshua' that makes them prophecy.

So again, if you begin to _layer_ John 1 over Gen 1 you get some very accurate match ups.

This should probably be a whole new post, but in the Greek there is a verb tense called the 'Aorist'
there is no equivalent in English. Aorist tense is not subject to time. It is outside the realm of time. So what happened in the translations is that it was always translated in the past tense.
This happened in John 1, where it reads 'the Word was made flesh and tabernacled among us.' (past tense)
It should read 'The Word was, is, and shall be made flesh, tabernacling within us.'

That means you Shaun and everyone else that has the Word planted within them. Just like Yahshua you are the Word made flesh or becoming the Word made flesh.
So even as Yahshua was 'transfigured on the Mount' why should it be any different with us?

Oh yeah, forgot to mention.

Seeing as the 'Messiah was cut off in the midst of the week.' The means that there is still the last half of the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th days left.

I'm really not talking about 7th millennium here. However in that _frame_ of mind there is an overlap.

Michael